<%@ Language=JavaScript %> Introduction to Composite Design
Home / Tools
About
Partners
Contact Us
Links
Tool Provider -
ESR Technology

Engineering Solver

Background Info

Layer Property Prediction

Laminate Stress Analysis

Failure Criteria

Computer Codes in Design

Materials

Manufacturing Issues

Design Basics

Introduction to Composite Design

Composites: advantages and disadvantages

Composites have two distinct advantages over conventional materials: light weight in the form of high specific properties, and excellent corrosion resistance. The specific properties (stiffness or strength divided by specific gravity) of composites are much greater than other engineering materials. These benefits are self-evident with even glass-reinforced materials having properties equivalent to, or greater than, steel.

One note of caution, however, is that the high specific properties are only in the direction of reinforcement and stiffness and strength in other directions can be markedly lower. Here lies one of the complications, and one of the greatest challenges, with composites - anisotropy and heterogeneity. This arises when the properties of a material vary with direction and although it is possible to put fibres precisely where they are needed, i.e. in the direction of applied loading, this may be difficult in some cases. Indeed, there may be insufficient knowledge regarding the loads in the first instance. Design with composites therefore requires much more property data and is inherently more complex than design with more traditional materials.

Corrosion resistance is another outstanding attribute, particularly those with a polymeric matrix. The table indicates the range of media where the materials have been used successfully Scott Bader 1986. To be successful, special attention must be given to the details of the design to preclude ingress of fluids into the composite laminate where it may have a deleterious effect on the interlace between matrix and reinforcement and on the properties of the reinforcement itself.

Chemical Resistance of GRP composites

Acids

Sulphuric

Hydrochloric

Nitric*

Phosphoric

Alkalis

Sodium Hydroxide

Potassium Hydroxide

Aqueous salts

Ammonium, calcium, sodium, potassium salts

Oxidising agents

Chlorine

Sodium hypochloride

Organics

Alchohols, some acids, glycols, Aviation and diesel fuels

Tabulated information is indicative only. Reference must be made to technical data sheets pertaining to individual resin systems

Flexibility of manufacture is also a unique characteristic. Large, complex structures can be fabricated in one piece minimising tooling costs and obviating the need for joints and fastenings. The fact that during manufacture the material itself is being made at the same time as the component gives rise to tremendous scope for innovative design without the constraints of conventional metal-forming or machining processes. Other significant advantages may include:

  • Thermal properties. It is possible to design components with very low, even zero, thermal expansivity, a key factor in controlling dimensional tolerances. Also thermal conductivities are generally low which may be of significance in certain applications.
  • Fatigue. Certain composites, particularly those with carbon reinforcement have excellent fatigue characteristics - a clear benefit in many areas.
  • Wear resistance. Again, carbon fibre materials behave well due to the formation of a graphitic layer as wear begins.
  • Electrical properties. GRP is an excellent electric insulator. Electromagnetic characteristics can be especially valuable for a certain range of structures.
  • Finish. Because of the flexibility available during manufacture finishes such as pigmentation and textures can be easily incorporated.

In terms of disadvantages, there are two that require particular attention: Lack of ductility and inspectability. By and large whenever a ductile material is filled with reinforcement, be it in particulate or fibre form, a loss in toughness will result. This leads to a stress/strain curve, which is essentially linear to failure. Composites, therefore, are less forgiving materials than, say, metals, where stress concentrations and peak loadings can often be accommodated by redistribution as a result of local yielding. Great care must be taken with composites to ensure that all loadings are accounted for in the initial design. Coping with this can be made more difficult by the effects of anisotropy.

The difficulty with inspectability is not so much associated with the technique, although the heterogeneity of many composites can cause difficulties, but the scale of the required task. Metals can be procured in part finished form, e.g. plate, rod or tube, and supplied with a certificate of conformity which provides evidence of quality. Subsequent component inspection, over and above that required to check manufacturing tolerance, etc., can be limited to welds and joints. Composite components on the other hand require inspection over the whole surface, which can lead to a different scale of problem altogether. Whilst this issue is by no means insurmountable, quality assurance and inspection procedures must feature in the initial feasibility assessment. It should be emphasised that composites are not a panacea to all problems. An advantage for one application may be a disadvantage for another and often a compromise may be the most appropriate course of action. The point which can be made, however, is that the added flexibility offered by composites, together with the inherent advantages of light weight, corrosion resistance, etc., they possess over other materials, ensures that they must feature in the first rank of materials' options available to the engineer.


  1. 'Maximum working temperatures for crystic polyester resins', Scott Bader Technical Leaflet No. 145, 1986.

 

<%EndPage();%>